Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: RayChuang88
I don't know why the Russians still have a love for an automatic loading system for tank shells, given the notorious history of unreliability of such systems on the T-64 and T-80.

They were also just all-out fascinated with the old Swedish turretless S-Tank, which also had a gas turbine, and an automatic loader, easier to pull off reliably when you have a fixed barrel that doesn't have to rotate/elevate in a turret. We had four of the things for evaluation at Knox too, with a lot of interest paid until the Swedes got some T-72s and their antitank ammo from Finland and did some live fire testing of the things. Front, sides, rear: it didn't matter: either kinetic or HEAT rounds would punch right through like the armour was a plywood gunnery target.

I always thought that a fixed gun tank destroyer based on a German Marder or Bradley chassis might have some applications. But I'd really hate to crew in one up against a tank crew that really knows how to shoot...and modern electro-optical equipment and gunnery computers take a lot of the required skill out of the picture. And we're getting close to the possible of a remotely operated or autonomous AT vehicle, too.

Oh well, all we really need is wheelies that can be hauled around by C130s....

42 posted on 04/01/2015 7:47:30 AM PDT by archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: archy

You talking about the Strykers?

The MTVL was a superior vehicle IMO.


51 posted on 04/03/2015 7:04:14 PM PDT by 2CAVTrooper (Making harmless people defenseless, does not make dangerous people harmless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson