To: donna
Probably, because the old films could not hide as much things like height, the heights had to be real. Today, thanks to special effects, they can hide things like this so other things, like aesthetics become more important.
2 posted on
03/19/2015 11:10:40 AM PDT by
Jonty30
(What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
To: Jonty30
I was very upset upon learning that Tom Cruise was cast to play Jack Reacher.
7 posted on
03/19/2015 11:12:00 AM PDT by
gorush
(History repeats itself because human nature is static)
To: Jonty30
“...so other things, like aesthetics become more important...”
Tom Cruz has an aesthetic?
9 posted on
03/19/2015 11:12:54 AM PDT by
Da Coyote
To: Jonty30
As with Bogart, I’m pretty sure they still use boxes.
No CGI needed.
26 posted on
03/19/2015 11:20:56 AM PDT by
SJSAMPLE
To: Jonty30
Alan Ladd and Audie Murphy were short. James Dean was short (5’7”). Bogey was 5’8”. But a lot of the actresses were shorter back then too. Now they are all runway model height.
113 posted on
03/19/2015 12:15:58 PM PDT by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
To: Jonty30
because the old films could not hide as much things like height, the heights had to be real. Today, thanks to special effects, they can hide things like this
John Rhys –Davies is 6’1”……....
You kinda get used to all the special effects and make-up of monsters and things in movies today but to take an actor the size of John Rhys and turn him into a dwarf like they did in LOTR, I find simply amazing........
121 posted on
03/19/2015 12:35:47 PM PDT by
Hot Tabasco
(Uncle Sy: "Beavers are like Ninjas, they only come out at night and they're hard to find")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson