This is a distinctly different crime from murdering a baby in the womb. The killer murdered a baby after removing that baby from the womb, and that is felony murder, no word games required. We also need the laws you advocate, but this particular murder is not evidence in support of that need.
How is this a distinctly different crime from murdering a baby in the womb? Are you saying that if she had simply stabbed the woman in the belly, purposely killing her baby, that would be a less heinous crime than this?
To me, the fact that she removed the baby and took it to the hospital could be construed as meaning that, somewhere in her deranged mind, she didn’t want to harm the baby but only to steal it.
I’m sure this crazy lady is not a trained OBGYN, so if the prosecution is burdened to prove that the baby survived the removal process, that might be a little iffy.
Bottom line, I’m saying that the commies decided that a woman’s right to protect her children from harm only applies after they have been officially born. That is crazy and the public needs to be made aware how crazy that is.