Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: iowamark

Some Civil War historian claimed the Union was fighting with one hand behind its back. The South was at maximum effort while the North had plenty of capacity, men and material it could use if needed.


7 posted on 03/17/2015 8:19:29 AM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: C19fan

Shelby Foote said that in Ken Burns’s documentary.


12 posted on 03/17/2015 8:23:19 AM PDT by driftless2 (For long term happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan
"Some Civil War historian claimed the Union was fighting with one hand behind its back."

I think that is correct in terms of men, material, and logistics. The south and Lee never had a realistic chance of a conclusive military victory to back up the right of succession. It still would have been interesting to see what may have happened in terms of a settlement if Lee had prevailed at Gettysburg and had been able to flank Philly, Baltimore and/or Washington D.C. .

28 posted on 03/17/2015 8:31:22 AM PDT by buckalfa (First time listener, long time caller.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

Yet they had to draft immigrants as soon as they came off the boat. Somehow, that doesn’t suggest they weren’t starving for manpower.


286 posted on 03/20/2015 2:55:55 PM PDT by RWB Patriot ("My ability is a value that must be earned and I don't recognize anyone's need as a claim on me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson