Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dangus
So the question is not could the South have repelled the North, but could they have conquered it; could they have won without home-team advantage? Could they have invaded cities like Boston and New York?

The South's biggest advantage was that they were fighting for their homes and their way of life. Had they attempted conquest, they would have lost that strength. They would have had no chance of conquering the North.

128 posted on 03/17/2015 10:08:08 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Pollster1

Of course, they couldn’t. The decision to attack union forces which had withdrawn from 5 bases to Ft. Sumter was suicidally stupid. The big problem facing the South wasn’t invasion from the North, but what to do with millions of slaves as slavery became an increasingly obsolete economic strategy.

Lincoln’s plan to let slavery “wither on the vine” was much better for Dixie than the Confederacy’s plan to make the Southwest slave-dependent: The Great West wasn’t endless, and the region from the Ogallal Aquifer West could never have displaced southern cotton, or for that matter, rice, hogs or sugar. The plantation owners would have been much more wealthy controlling land as the US immigration population bulged and they gradually reduced their dependence on slavery.

But the problem was that the South feared retribution as slaves gained their freedom; they couldn’t imagine their slaves being their countrymen.


153 posted on 03/17/2015 11:11:59 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson