I’m not blaming men specifically, but, as in our previous conversations, you choose to see it that way.
My point addressed single parents who choose to have children without a husband or wife.
I agree that in a more perfect country, men should not choose to be single parents. Even if they choose to try and do the “noble” thing, a “wife” can choose to destroy that at any time.
Would you posit that the only two choices men have are to remain child-less or (as another poster put it) “enter into a state-sanctioned contract wherein the other party can terminate the contract at any time, without warning or cause and will take 50% of my assets and my children away while imparting life-long, recurring payments to support their ‘lifestyle choices” ?