You may be serious but it just makes your argument all the more ridiculous. To establish your moral equivalency argument you select a man who has a large house, pool, secretary, a business with an obvious mid-six figure salary. I.e. <1% of American males. That you need to go to <1% of the population to make an argument, which you are serious about, illustrates nothing but the absurdity of your viewpoint.
Sorry about your divorce.