Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

One minute Youtube video: Robin Thicke - Blurred Lines VS Marvin Gaye - Got to Give it Up
1 posted on 03/12/2015 4:09:25 AM PDT by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: iowamark
Marvin must not have left his "children" enough money. None of them seem very bright, so this was some lawyers idea. Nothing makes sense anymore. I bet they were pretty surprised when they found out that a black guy wrote the song. I bet they went after Thicke because he's white trying to sound black.

All I can say is that if this race baiting keeps happening, it's not going to end well for that certain 13% of the country.

2 posted on 03/12/2015 4:22:15 AM PDT by defconw (If not now, WHEN?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iowamark

The jury didn’t listen to Marvin Gaye’s recording; they listened to a new recording based on the sheet music for the song that was submitted for the copyright claim.


3 posted on 03/12/2015 4:23:25 AM PDT by Pan_Yan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iowamark
Who will be the future arbiter of similar music patterns? What will be the standard?

Here is another example, using country music examples to illustrate how this is troubling...


4 posted on 03/12/2015 4:23:32 AM PDT by wtd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iowamark

I don’t know anything about Robin Thicke, but I’ve heard the pieces in question and yes it sounds similar, but I think that could be said about a lot of songs. The writer of the article goes onto compare it to a case involving sampling. When a hip hop artist samples a song, they are taking a piece of the exact song and putting it in their song. To me, that is wrong and the artist should be paying royalties to the people they sample. It’s like a writer that takes an exact passage of a book and puts it in his story without attribution.


10 posted on 03/12/2015 4:43:12 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iowamark
Who is going to get sued on this one. . .??

A huge amount of pop hits are based on a 4-chord progression

13 posted on 03/12/2015 4:48:06 AM PDT by Salgak (Peace Through Superior Firepower. . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iowamark
Copyright has got out of hand. Big Media extended the term to in some cases 100 years plus buy buying congress. This is asinine.

Copyright was originally for a term under 20 years. (Statute of Anne IIRC) Now Big Media wants to lock up everything in the name of "Intellectual Rights"

Warner/Chappell (One of the biggest of the Big Media Music Rights holders) holds the rights to "Happy Birthday to You" and still tries to charge people for singing the song in a restaurant and the song was first published in 1893.

Our Constitution grants two 14 year terms. But Big Media paid Congress critters to extend that term to now over 70 years and in some cases well over 100 years. It needs to be repealed back to the original and defund these leeches and allow the works to fall in the public domain after the two 14 year terms.

18 posted on 03/12/2015 5:10:19 AM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iowamark
Didn't Thicke's dad have a show called "In The Thicke of the Night" a while back?
19 posted on 03/12/2015 5:13:54 AM PDT by 4yearlurker (Fifteen two,fifteen four and a pair is six.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iowamark

Back about 10-15 years ago I was riding with my daughter listening to the radio. A song started and I said “Great,I love this old America tune.” Come to find out it was a Janet Jackson song/ripoff!


21 posted on 03/12/2015 5:16:24 AM PDT by 4yearlurker (Fifteen two,fifteen four and a pair is six.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iowamark

Hmmm. Anything that is bad for ‘pop’ music sounds pretty good to me.


24 posted on 03/12/2015 5:52:27 AM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iowamark

Pop music is so lame, it needed a shakeup.


26 posted on 03/12/2015 6:02:31 AM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iowamark
The real important question is, where does this legally leave Weird Al Yankovic's parody of Blurred Lines, Word Crimes?
28 posted on 03/12/2015 6:06:31 AM PDT by lump in the melting pot (Half-brother is Watching You!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iowamark
Next up on the Soul Train of jury awards...

Pharrell's "Happy" vs Gaye's "Ain't That Peculiar"...?

"Entertainment After "Blurred Lines" victory, Gaye family takes another listen to "Happy" - http://www.cbsnews.com/news/after-blurred-lines-victory-gaye-family-takes-another-listen-to-happy/

31 posted on 03/12/2015 6:43:22 AM PDT by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iowamark

The modern copyright law is what is bad for music. The song in question should have been in the public domain 10 years ago.


37 posted on 03/12/2015 8:10:28 AM PDT by zeugma ( The Clintons Could Find a Loophole in a Stop Sign)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iowamark

Robin Thicke and Pharrell Williams are sleazy karaoke singers.


48 posted on 03/12/2015 11:02:14 AM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson