Skip to comments.
World’s Most Powerful Camera Receives Funding Approval
SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory ^
| January 9, 2015
| No Attribution
Posted on 02/24/2015 6:17:46 PM PST by MeshugeMikey
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
To: MeshugeMikey
Well, as typical, they suck...
21
posted on
02/24/2015 6:38:59 PM PST
by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
To: MeshugeMikey
22
posted on
02/24/2015 6:39:10 PM PST
by
knarf
(I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but, they're true)
To: LegendHasIt
Stars are sources of energy.
23
posted on
02/24/2015 6:45:09 PM PST
by
reg45
(Barack 0bama: Implementing class warfare by having no class.)
To: Fungi
My Canon camer has 21...megapixels
a 3200 Megapixel sensor is likely going to be pretty hefty
the lens Im thinking will be a fixed lens..and thus add to the measured size of the camera body
24
posted on
02/24/2015 6:45:13 PM PST
by
MeshugeMikey
("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
To: MeshugeMikey
How long before we see selfies from that camera?
25
posted on
02/24/2015 6:45:28 PM PST
by
Gamecock
(Joel Osteen is a minister of the Gospel like Colonel Sanders is an Infantry officer.)
To: Vendome
I cant imagine what sort of Networked computers...they will need to process photos that large...
a few terrabytes of ram.... at a minimum..
26
posted on
02/24/2015 6:47:13 PM PST
by
MeshugeMikey
("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
To: MeshugeMikey
It seems to me that the ability to resolve detail depends to a great degree on how many pixels there are to the square inch or square whatever.
27
posted on
02/24/2015 6:48:30 PM PST
by
yarddog
(Romans 8:38-39, For I am persuaded.)
To: Gamecock
it would require a very VERY strong wifi signal to get any usable results...
28
posted on
02/24/2015 6:48:57 PM PST
by
MeshugeMikey
("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
To: MeshugeMikey
3200 megapixel camera = 160 x 20 megapixel cameras; these egg-heads are going to spend hundreds of millions of dollars that we don’t have on this project - utter insanity!
29
posted on
02/24/2015 6:49:28 PM PST
by
Ken522
To: yarddog
the resoluton is dependant on the number of dots....or pixels and their size
Id like to know who got the contract for the sensor or multi[ple sensors
30
posted on
02/24/2015 6:50:45 PM PST
by
MeshugeMikey
("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
To: Ken522
they’re doing their part to increase the size of the deficit!
31
posted on
02/24/2015 6:51:55 PM PST
by
MeshugeMikey
("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
To: MeshugeMikey
I was off by a factor of 100, but still, seems rather small for such a large scope.
32
posted on
02/24/2015 6:52:38 PM PST
by
Fungi
(Evolution is piece by piece over billions of years. At what point did a precursor become a human?)
To: MeshugeMikey
It depends on how many pixels per area. The quality of the optics, the quality of the pixels, plus probably many other factors count but the density of pixels is critical, not just how many.
33
posted on
02/24/2015 6:57:40 PM PST
by
yarddog
(Romans 8:38-39, For I am persuaded.)
To: Fungi
Im thinking that theres still a glass ceiling for the production of a larger sensor..so to speak.
im guessing that theres likely a threshold in the technical feasibility
34
posted on
02/24/2015 6:58:12 PM PST
by
MeshugeMikey
("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
To: MeshugeMikey
What contributions? As I recall from basic astronomy, black holes do nothing but take stuff, much like black people.
35
posted on
02/24/2015 6:59:04 PM PST
by
__rvx86
(Rafael Cruz Jr: soon to be the first conservative, Latino President of the U.S. ¡Si se puede!)
To: MeshugeMikey
The Sigma sensor is interesting. Have you read about it? Intuitively it makes more sense than CCD or CMOS, but it never took hold.
36
posted on
02/24/2015 7:01:31 PM PST
by
Fungi
(Evolution is piece by piece over billions of years. At what point did a precursor become a human?)
To: __rvx86
I was being as sarcastic as humanly possible,
I suspect that they will be photographing the deficit in their spare time
37
posted on
02/24/2015 7:03:04 PM PST
by
MeshugeMikey
("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
To: Fungi
Yes I have been paying a lot of attention to that one since they accounced that 22k dollar camera that was then marked down to around iK.
I sense that there will likely be a breakthrough of another sort in sensor technology within the next five years or so.
38
posted on
02/24/2015 7:04:57 PM PST
by
MeshugeMikey
("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
To: yarddog
39
posted on
02/24/2015 7:05:37 PM PST
by
MeshugeMikey
("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
To: Fungi
I guess you are talking about the foveon sensor. I don’t really understand exactly how they work but I have read that it has 3 layers and acts more like film.
It does take more pixels for the same resolution tho. Sigma still uses it and they have their fans.
40
posted on
02/24/2015 7:08:05 PM PST
by
yarddog
(Romans 8:38-39, For I am persuaded.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson