LOL!
Kook Alert!
Posted on 02/23/2015 12:02:59 PM PST by Windflier
I was merely conceding your point that birth certificates indicate the race of the parents, not the child.
But isn't it strange that Obama's says his father is African. That is a nationality and not a race.
Yes, and it's a glaring red flag that Obama's COLB is totally fraudulent. The word, "African", on that document is as bad as the superscript on Dan Rather's forged docs re: George Bush.
Will let's see, you want me to prove my theory without having to prove your theory, over photos that I cannot post because they'll be deleted by the mods, while dismissing (as absurd) the very concept that the government might be doctoring photos to hide evidence that the President may have once had brain surgery, because they simply wouldn't ever try to hide such a thing or confuse the evidence for it.
Just want to make your proposal clear here.
Hmm, let's see, what to do.
I know, I'll just say this (again): I think those are scars on Obama's head, and not parted hair marks perceptible only to black people with personal experience in nappy hair behavior that is simply unknown to white people.
That's it, that's what I'm doing, right there - I'm saying that.
Oh, and I'll say one more thing. I don't think the NSA is handling the photo evidence manipulation on the Obama head scar coverup mission. If I were to choose, I'd say that would fall to the NASA photo manipulators that faked the moon landings. Because in the same way they used the same background hills for all the faked moon photos, they're using the same background head for these faked nappy hair combing swirl lines. Gives it away right there, IMO.
LOL!
Kook Alert!
I sincerely hope that you’ve been pulling my leg all this time. If not, this thread is fixin’ to be all kinda fun.
obumpa
Nope, I was only joking about the NASA moon hoax pictures, because they assembled those fake photos by hand. In contrast, the Obama photo fakers use Photoshop to erase his scars.
Big tech difference.
This is hopeless. If you're determined to believe the 'scar' meme, despite the simple evidence and logic I posed to you, then be my guest.
Logic? LOL, Obama doesn't even brush his hair - it's far too short for that whether he's black, white, purple or green - there's your "evidence." And the scars are totally obvious as scars. You talk utter nonsense and demand it be accepted as straight - you're brazenly insulting to the intelligence of everyone who reads your words.
You think what you're doing is just a technique, but it's not - it's deeply wrong. You treat people with contempt and think it doesn't touch you, doesn't change you inside.
But it does.
Good grief. With every post you make on this, you're demonstrating your utter ignorance and inability to process simple logic, facts, and reason.
I told you in a couple of previous posts that I have roughly the same genetic background as BHO. Because of that, I'm intimately familiar with his sort of hair. Many people in my family possess the exact same grade, as well as countless other black people I've known in this life.
Blacks with short kinky hair do brush it, despite your nonsensical claim to the contrary. When they do, it doesn't behave the same way that short straight hair does. If it's brushed in one direction, it stays that way. It doesn't return to its natural growth position, as short straight hair does. If you brush two sections of that sort of hair in two different directions, it will create a part that stays put until you apply a brush to take it out.
- you're brazenly insulting to the intelligence of everyone who reads your words.
I'm insulting your intelligence? No, I'm speaking from personal observation and experience, while proving my point with simple logic and reason. What I'm NOT doing, is presenting some wild assed, cockamamie conspiracy theory, that can't be proved.
In addition to my personal life observations, I also asked you:
1. Why don't Obama's alleged 'scars' don't show up in every single photo of him?
2. Why do new 'scars' seem to show up in photos, then magically disappear in other shots of the same area of his scalp?
3. Why have we never seen two photos taken of him at different times, which show the exact same 'scar', in the exact same position?
Your answer to those simple questions was a blubbering excuse about government re-touchers air brushing the 'scars' away. Do you not understand that that is simple conjecture on your part, and not even terribly believable by any mature, well-informed, thinking adult?
Do you not realize that your explanation only covers official government controlled photos of the man? Are you incapable of grasping the fact that thousands of photos of Obama have been taken by private citizens, and are posted online?
Do you really think that your alleged government re-touchers have the means and wherewithal to track down every single online image of Obama and edit out his 'scars' before those photos are shared hundreds of thousands of times?
You're grasping at straws here. You're falling through space because your theory leaves you no solid ground to stand on. In the meantime, you're screaming at me because I'm pointing out the obvious, which blows apart something you're desperate to believe in.
Well, sorry, but facts is facts, logic is logic, and I can't un-know what I know about black hair.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.