Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/14/2015 2:22:45 PM PST by BruceDeitrickPrice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: BruceDeitrickPrice
Anyone old enough to remember Dick and Jane?

They made us all bad spellers!

2 posted on 02/14/2015 2:33:21 PM PST by donna (Gov. Mike Huckabee beat the Clinton machine in Arkansas. He can do it again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BruceDeitrickPrice

Chinese kids learn several thousand characters. Just sayin’.


3 posted on 02/14/2015 2:34:19 PM PST by TigersEye (ISIS is the tip of the spear. The spear is Islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BruceDeitrickPrice
Boob, from a draftsman's viewpoint, is the perfect sight word. The first letter, B provides a visual top, or plan, view. The second two letters, oo, provide a front, or elevation, view. The last letter, b, provides a side view.

Onomatopoeia is a category of words that sound like what they attempt to describe. There is no category of words that look like what they are attempting to describe.

4 posted on 02/14/2015 2:35:34 PM PST by gorush (History repeats itself because human nature is static)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BruceDeitrickPrice

“Teach a child what each letter stands for and he can read. I know, you say, it can’t be that simple. But it is.”

Yea, verily! I was able to read about as well as anyone in my one-room country school on the day I first entered the building, because (1)I had been given a colorful alphabet book as a “toy,” and my grandfather (a proxy Dad in my case) satisfied my innate curiosity about the sounds represented by those letters; and (2) books were made available to me at least a year prior to my enrolling in a school, and Grandpa helped me as needed in my attempts to do what came naturally, read.
Much later, my own children, supplied with alphabet books and a mother that would sit down and read to them, at age 4-5 were trying to read the words on the Wheaties box at the breakfast table. Why is it so difficult to teach children something that they want to badly to learn, imitating what they see their parents do?
Possibly I just answered that question.


8 posted on 02/14/2015 2:43:15 PM PST by Elsiejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BruceDeitrickPrice

Here is Mr. Price’s prescription below. Who can argue with any of this except the Universities and Colleges who keep churning out people who have no clue how to teach children anything except SJW propaganda. This abject failure posing as “Formal Education” is a purposeful fraud. If I had a young child these days, he/she would be home schooled using this approach.

1. REAL READING. That means systematic phonics for several months until children learn to read. That means no Whole Word, no sight-words, no Dolch words, no high-frequency words. These gimmicks are all the same thing and the reason we have 50 million functional illiterates.

2. REAL ARITHMETIC. Schools use sensible, coherent programs such as Saxon Math, Singapore Math, or the like. (They do not use Reform Math in any of its forms— Everyday Math, Connected Math, TERC.) Children master basic skills, know the multiplication tables, and can find answers. No more spiraling, fuzziness, or dependence on calculators.

3. REAL LEARNING. It’s knowledge-based and fact-filled. Children learn basic information in the fields of Geography, History, Science, Literature, etc. Students advance in a logical way from the simple to the complex—which leads to genuine critical thinking.

4. REAL EDUCATION. It’s academically correct (as opposed to politically correct). The emphasis is on building study skills and scholarly character. Students know a great deal, and know how to learn more. They can do independent work. They understand that precision, rigor, and honesty are the same things.


9 posted on 02/14/2015 2:43:28 PM PST by Sioux-san
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BruceDeitrickPrice
I taught two of my children to read at age 5. It is simple, starting with what sounds letters make, to three-letter words, then four, then basic English language "rules". It was wonderful to see. We didn't even finish the instruction book and like a light bulb it "clicked" and they never looked back.

Creating failure in students by using destructive reading methods creates A LOT of union-dues-paying jobs to "fix" the problem they created. Just sayin ....

16 posted on 02/14/2015 2:50:31 PM PST by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BruceDeitrickPrice

I have reprints of McGuffy and a computer version. Both are excellent tools for home schooling.


21 posted on 02/14/2015 3:14:02 PM PST by Excellence (Marine mom since April 11, 2014)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Trillian

we knew it all along...


31 posted on 02/14/2015 11:49:16 PM PST by Conservative4Life (I'm not too worried, I've read the book and know how it all ends...We win)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BruceDeitrickPrice

Been reading all my life and started at 4. Have a decent vocabulary and can’t claim to “read/sound out” most words these days because when i see a word, my brain recognizes it “by sight”. It would be a step backwards to have to mentally go through the process for each word as if it was new to me.


32 posted on 02/15/2015 5:14:23 AM PST by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BruceDeitrickPrice

bookmark


37 posted on 02/20/2015 9:43:59 PM PST by Steve0113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson