Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Steve Newton

There have been attempts by some government officials to tax churches before, even though they’ve not been taxed since the foundation of this country. And the US Supreme Court has said (at least in one case) that this power to tax would also mean that it would be the power to dissolve the church, too ... and therefore to tax it would be Unconstitutional.

What was meant was, and they said this ... was that if the taxes were not paid, the power to tax also gives the power to seize and sell, thereby dissolving the church ... therefore the power to tax is Unconstituonal, per the First Amendment.


43 posted on 02/07/2015 6:22:14 PM PST by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: Star Traveler

Again: “ Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof”. The RIOT Act neither establishes any religion, nor does it prohibit the free exercise of any religion.

It simply indicates that Islam is not to be recognized as exempt from taxation due to the fact that it is a political institution in conflict with the guaranteed principles of this country.

Note it is a POLITICAL institution and not a religious one.


44 posted on 02/07/2015 6:29:46 PM PST by Steve Newton (And the Wolves will learn what we have shown before-We love our sheep we dogs of war. Vaughn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson