No, I’m saying that we’re a Constitutional Republic which doesn’t allow tyranny of the majority, which is why Communists and Nazis (as they are much smaller than the majority view) are not subject to the popular view that they shouldn’t be allowed here at all ... but instead ... their Constitutional rights in this Constitutional Republic are protected from such a “Democracy” that you or I don’t want.
No, I’m saying that we’re a Constitutional Republic which doesn’t allow tyranny of the majority, which is why Communists and Nazis (as they are much smaller than the majority view) are not subject to the popular view that they shouldn’t be allowed here at all ... but instead ... their Constitutional rights in this Constitutional Republic are protected from such a “Democracy” that you or I don’t want.This sounds quite similar to some of your previous distortions of this country's principles, such as post #112 suggesting that Nazism and Communism cannot violently overthrow this country, but they can institute their designs (agendas) if they get their representatives put into government, which sounded quite a lot like Democracy to me. The Constitution does not "prohibit tyranny of the majority," it just does not indulge that tyranny, denying it leverage in the government and license to dictate to others as occurs under Democracy. However this is not the same thing as our "rights .. being protected from such a Democracy". If our rights are to be protected, then by whom? Government itself has fabricated this corruption since the Civil War so as to empower itself in actions regarding "rights", when those rights are specifically recognized to protect us from the direction of that government itself. Government has even fabricated a non-existent collective "Rights", and used this to presucute inviduals, when it neither authority to create rights, nor to prosecute individuals anywhere in the Constitution, even modified by those "33 amendments." This "Free Speech" referenced in the First Amendment is not a right to say whatever one wants, wherever one wants to so, but rather is indicated as "Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech." Nowhere in this reference to speech is there any sort of compulsion for others to listen to us, or that we shall be heard in any venue, nowhere does this freedom compel others to listen to us, engage us, or tolerate us. Nowhere does this serve as an obligation to indulge any particular "speech" t-shirt in our schools, much less provide fodder for law suits. Nowhere does this serve as any sort of "Demand License" to be used against fellow citizens, but this is how government itself has corrupted it. Similarly, "Freedom of Religion" indicates two things, that Congress shall make no law 1) establishing religion or 2) or prohibiting the free exercise [of religion]. Nowhere does this freedom of religion provide a license to exercise that religion in whatever place, at whatever time. "Free exercise" of religion does not necessitate it being done in any particular community. Nowhere does this compel communities to welcome any particular religion into that community, nor to accept their houses of worship, as as misstated regarding the Mosque at "Ground Zero". Nowhere does this freedom of religion prohibit a community from excluding in their midst any particular organization, religion or faith based on their own recognition of conflict with that community. Nothing in the Constitution prohibits individuals, or communities from discouraging religions in their midst, but rather it only address Congress specifically, and government more generally, particularly "laws" (i.e. "establishment"). Nowhere does that "Freedom of Religion" prohibit Islam and Mosques from being recognized as invariably (without exception) being political organizations, which are incompatible with this country's principles, given disallowing freedom of faith, and other compulsions such, thereby subject to taxation. None of the prohibitions in the First Amendment are violated by indicating Islamic organizations and Mosques are subject to taxation. Again, nothing expressed or implied in the Constitution involves any obligation to indulge everything calling itself a religion in community.