No. They aren't. Name one scripture where The King commanded anyone to commit such atrocities! Unlike isLame, you can not!
The Crusade atrocity's were done in the name of the preservation of civilization.
Peaceful slimes are the forward operating base for the barbaric savage murderers that walk amongst them. Human shields for the horrors of satanic hatred against mankind!
The horrors of the HRCC, were committed in the name of the HRCC!
Why would you believe anything Hussein says?
Seriously!?!
That's not what BHO said. He never said Jesus commanded it...he said it was done in the "NAME" of Jesus....using it as an excuse...and for that he is correct (for anyone willing to be honest with history). He is partially correct about slavery. I grew up in the south where many of the older Baptists I knew (who were born in the 1800's) justified prejudice because they believed blacks didn't have a soul...or it was the mark of Cain. He conveniently left out the fact it was Christians who ended slavery....something Muslims have never done.
No...they were not. They were territorial wars which were defending against Muslim aggression...but they used the premise of it being a HOLY war and promised eternal gifts for those willing to fight....not unlike what radical Islam promises. Pope Urban II offered a Crusade Papal Bull that promised indulgences (an unbiblical idea to begin with) and eternal life for anyone willing to fight in the crusades.
You know, you simply cannot defend the Crusades and at the same time claim they were atrocities.
What is HRCC? Holy Roman Catholic Church?
Obama said people who claimed to be Christian fought the Crusades in the name of Christ. That is entirely accurate. Whether Christ accepted them as fighting for Him is an entirely different question.
Obama also said people who claimed to be Christians also justified slavery as Christian. This is also entirely true.