[.45 Long Colt]

I haven’t made my argument and I’m not going to. I’ve argued over this enough the past several years. But do you actually think a man like Churchill, with obvious divided loyalties, would have been constitutionally eligible?

[C. Edmund Wright]

I wasn’t commenting on Churchill’s eligibility - I was simply saying he would have been a better President than most that we have had. It’s called making a point, not a literal legal case.

As for his loyalties? He was more pro American than many Americans are today.

[mlo]

"But do you actually think a man like Churchill, with obvious divided loyalties, would have been constitutionally eligible?"

If he was born a citizen and retained that citizenship, then he would have been eligible. The constitution says nothing about "divided loyalties".

[editor-surveyor]

.
Now you know all you need to know about “C. Edmund Wright.”
.