Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Responsibility2nd

you are wrong.

if being a citizen was enough, as it was for all other Constitutionally defined positions, they wouldn’t have used a different term for POTUS


31 posted on 02/05/2015 8:40:03 AM PST by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: sten

It definitely means something and frankly, if the founders didn’t define it, then it should be used in the strictest sense and include every possible exclusion as I see it only benefits our nation from the threat of foreign allegiances. The definition is only needed by those seeking to usurp it.


69 posted on 02/05/2015 10:17:09 AM PST by xander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson