I'm pretty D*** sure that I do. I've been studying it for ~ seven years, and i'm still finding out new information on this topic. There is a lot of stuff in history that seriously conflicts with what is the current official court position.
Strange. That doesn't sound like anything I've ever said.
When you say that we should just accept whatever the courts says instead of researching it and learning where the courts took a wrong turn, it amounts to the same thing.
There are people spending years studying the faked moon landings too. People make up their mind and then spend years finding evidence that supports them. See "Confirmation Bias".
"When you say that we should just accept whatever the courts says..."
I didn't actually say that did I? However, when you are talking about a legal issue citing what the court says is directly relevant and important. This is a legal question. One various courts, including the Supreme Court, has already written about. And it really isn't that hard. As the Supreme Court has already ruled, "natural born citizen" carried the same intent as "natural born subject". All the "studying" that birthers engage in is ultimately just a strenuous effort to deny that obvious fact.
Ultimately it's a complete waste of effort. You aren't ever going to win this argument. The courts that have bothered to address it do not agree with you. That is not going to change. All you will ever accomplish is sitting at home telling anyone that will listen how you are right and everyone else is wrong. Good luck with that.