Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hackers abuse another Adobe Flash zero-day to attack thousands of web users with redirects
MacDailyNews ^ | Monday, February 2, 2015

Posted on 02/03/2015 12:12:35 PM PST by Swordmaker

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: SecondAmendment
Did you LOOK at your exalted link? The LATEST it has listed says:

WebKit, as used in Apple Safari before 6.2.1, 7.x before 7.1.1, and 8.x before 8.0.1, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption and application crash) via a crafted web site, a different vulnerability than other WebKit CVEs listed in APPLE-SA-2014-12-2-1.

Do you know what a "Sandbox" means? The most the vulnerability can do is CRASH Safari. That is all any code execution can do. . . it cannot reach the OS or any other data or apps running. Just exactly what I told you. Not much.

21 posted on 02/03/2015 5:03:20 PM PST by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users contnue...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
Do you know what a "Sandbox" means? The most the vulnerability can do is CRASH Safari.

Yes, I am a professional software developer, and I know what a "Sandbox" is. And I know the code it the typical browser is so complicated that its impossible to know exactly what it does, especially since they accept "broken HTML" by choice.

That's why Safari's sandbox has been bypassed before, as in the case with this vulnerability (Heap-based buffer overflow in Apple Safari 7.0.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code and bypass a sandbox protection mechanism ...).

And don't think I am taking this out on Macs, because I just happen to own a few, and my primary dev box is a MacBook Pro with Yosemite.

My point is, running remote code in a browser is dangerous, period.

22 posted on 02/03/2015 5:24:02 PM PST by SecondAmendment (Restoring our Republic at 9.8357x10^8 FPS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SecondAmendment
That's why Safari's sandbox has been bypassed before, as in the case with this vulnerability (Heap-based buffer overflow in Apple Safari 7.0.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code and bypass a sandbox protection mechanism ...).

And Safari is Version 8.0.3

23 posted on 02/03/2015 5:46:14 PM PST by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users contnue...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom
I think Netflix is also looking at HTML5, but I don’t have a source for that.

NetFlix runs fine on iPads and iPhones no Flash involved.

24 posted on 02/03/2015 6:14:25 PM PST by itsahoot (55 years a republican-Now Independent. Will write in Sarah Palin, no matter who runs. $.98-$.89<$.10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

Didn’t Steve Jobs express his “disdain” for Flash? Didn’t he warn of both the resource hogging and security vulnerabilities it opened up - all as just part of why he chose to not support Flash directly?

Are Adobe programmers former MS employees? Good grief!


25 posted on 02/04/2015 9:35:25 AM PST by TheBattman (Isn't the lesser evil... still evil?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson