Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: wardaddy

Its not that Lincoln didn’t want to free the slaves in MO,KY,MD, or DE. He had not Constitutional authority to do so. The 1857 Dred Scott v. Sanford decision by the Supreme Court specifically stated that the Federal Government had not authority to interfere with slavery in any state where it was legal. Lincoln spent considerable time and energy during the war to try an persuade these four states to outlaw slavery. The only state to do so was Maryland in Oct 1864.


53 posted on 02/03/2015 3:32:26 AM PST by X Fretensis (IW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: X Fretensis
The only state to do so was Maryland in Oct 1864.

Missouri did also in early 1865.

56 posted on 02/03/2015 5:00:43 AM PST by Ditto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: X Fretensis

It was not politically expedient

Lincolns constitutional authority was fairly arbitrary

Understandable given it was a war


60 posted on 02/03/2015 9:14:32 AM PST by wardaddy (glenn beck is a nauseous politically correct conservative on LSD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson