Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Talisker

“Persons NOT being “People.””

That sounds like a distinction without a difference. What’s your point?


24 posted on 02/02/2015 8:46:57 PM PST by Pelham (WWIII. Islam vs the West)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Pelham
That sounds like a distinction without a difference. What’s your point?

"Not" is never without difference. "People" are the unincorporated human beings of the preamble of the Constitution who have God-given rights.

"Persons" are incorporated "individuals" who have government granted privileges.

So technically, all Lincoln did was assert federal ownership over State-authorized slaves, thus "freeing" them from their slavery under State law by transferring them to federal control.

But he did nothing for an already free people.

Except perhaps start to confuse this extraordinarily important distinction, which was then buried into normalization (but not changed) in the 13th and especially the 14th Amendments - and remains little known by the public to this day.

35 posted on 02/02/2015 9:56:49 PM PST by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson