Posted on 02/01/2015 1:29:42 PM PST by ReformationFan
C.S. Lewis wrote in 1952 that perversions of the sex instinct are numerous, hard to cure, and frightful.
The good Oxford don did not live to see the times we now live in, times in which progressive extremists can state a straight face that actually there are no sexual perversions times in which even the long-held taboos against pedophilia and incest are falling like dominoes.
The evidence that in the name of absolute sexual freedom, traditional taboos are no longer to be honored is everywhere. While sexual perversion has always existed, it has never been as widely tolerated and even promoted as it is today.
Examples abound too many to cite.
But there is the case of the teenage girl who has decided to marry her dad and move to New Jersey, where incest, she stated, is legal.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Lack of sleep is a recurring and unavoidable characteristic of human existence, and yes, operating a vehicle while enduring a sufficient lack of sleep is considered an irresponsible and illegal act.
Alcohol has been discussed with you ad infinitum. I'm not going to waste my time by once again pointing out to you the very wide distinctions between alcohol and narcotic drugs. Setting "adults' bedtimes" is a blatant strawman because you have no better arguments to offer.
Indeed, false equivalency is the essential bulk of what you put forth in the way of arguments.
You are helping evil. You are helping the forces of social destruction. You are working diligently to unleash this Pandora's box of evil on us. You are just like the homosexual activists trying to mainstream perversion. You are just doing it with drugs.
Lack of sleep directly impacts adults' ability to make rational decisions, as does drinking alcohol; is government therefore authorized to set adults' bedtimes and ban alcohol?
Lack of sleep is a recurring and unavoidable characteristic of human existence,
Much sleep loss is avoidable - by your argument, government is authorized to regulate that.
and yes, operating a vehicle while enduring a sufficient lack of sleep is considered an irresponsible and illegal act.
As should be the case for any mind-altering drug - but your argument went beyond operating vehicles.
Alcohol has been discussed with you ad infinitum. I'm not going to waste my time by once again pointing out to you the very wide distinctions between alcohol and narcotic drugs.
The argument you presented here doesn't support any such distinction - you Drug Warriors are always moving the goalposts from one failed argument to the next.
You might as well say Lobotomy patients are of "sound mind." No, they are not, and neither are drug addicts.
What about nonaddicted users?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.