Irrelevant.
Sorry to hear you are offended by the truth about the Marxists.
I'm not offended, just disappointed. You know better, and can do better, but you don't. The last thing any of that crap is is the truth.
Oh I thought you were interested in that issue. Nevermind then.
I'm not offended, just disappointed. You know better, and can do better, but you don't. The last thing any of that crap is is the truth.
You're not offended but then you call it all crap. Uh huh. So which part isn't true? Point it out. All I cited was historical pacts.
. Face it. If the Republican party of that time wasn't liberal, the communists wouldn't have gone for it. If the democrat party was the liberal one they would have sided with it.
Which US States Would Survive As Independent Nations?
Of course it's tongue in cheek, but they go about it in precisely the wrong way, assuming that the richer (usually smaller, more populous, less military) states would be more likely to survive as independent countries than most of the poorer ones (they also appoint themselves as arbiters of a state's "likeability," which one has to be pretty arrogant to do).
My hunch is that states like Delaware, Connecticut, and Rhode Island wouldn't last long if some enemy wanted their resources and territory. While it's not likely that the reverse is true either (economic and educational resources do count for something in the world), it does look very wrong-headed.
Anyway, good for a laugh on a Saturday afternoon.