[bolobaby]

SO, here’s what sucks for Seattle and all the anti-Patriots folks:

You know the officials will be all over the footballs at the Superbowl like white on rice. If the Patriots still trounce the Seahawks... well... they beat you fair and square even after you made all that noise about them being cheaters. How stupid do you look now?

(For the record, I’m not really a football fan.)

[who_would_fardels_bear]

"If the Patriots still trounce the Seahawks... well... they beat you fair and square"

They'll just find another way to cheat against the cheating 'roid ridden Seahawks.

They should call it the Cheater's Bowl.

Maybe they can get Cheetos as a last minute stand-in sponsor.

[knarf]

Except ... the Seahawks are .. and have been ... silent

[Colofornian]

SO, here’s what sucks for Seattle and all the anti-Patriots folks: You know the officials will be all over the footballs at the Superbowl like white on rice.

Well, why? Can't understand ANY need to monitor the Patriots' off-the-field antics. (You DO know they're as pure-as-white-rice, doncha?)

SO, here’s what sucks for Seattle and all the anti-Patriots folks:...If the Patriots still trounce the Seahawks... well... they beat you fair and square even after you made all that noise about them being cheaters. How stupid do you look now?

Let me get this straight, using a parallel scenario:

You're telling us that if a Dem Congressional or POTUS candidate "trounces" his opponent in November...
...after...
...allegations of dead-voters & voters voting multiple times emerge from the primary race...
...a race that the Democratic candidate may have won anyway -- minus the shenanigans...
...that any FREEPERs commenting upon said Democratic shenanigans...
...would "look...stupid"???

Did I get that right?

(And you call yourself a "conservative" why again?)

[Lexinom]

Did you learn NOTHING from last year?