******************************EXCERPTS*****************
whiten says:
rooter
It is just fantastic. This could be a classic. Surely beats the interpolation in gistemp.
Yes rooter it is fantastic
..especially while it shows that people like your self can not distinguish between climate and weather, or yearly cycles.
Estimating and evaluating the particular 2014 in the format of 10,000 years is a climatic evaluation.
I know this make no heads or tails for you thus far
.be patient.
A climatic evaluation or estimation is not calculated only on temp variations,
.. like the measured amount of warming or cooling during the year
..but actually through the CS metric
. the amount of temp variation in accordance to CO2 emissions.
Whatever value of CS you fancy, according to the reality this is the higher CO2 emission-concentration year for the last 10,000 years with an amount of warming that makes this year with the less ever amplifying of warming, meaning that the 2014 regardless of so much CO2 in atmosphere shows no amplifying and therefor showing that there is no warming whatsoever but actually the climatic signal is one of cooling, to the extent of it been the higher COOLING CLIMATIC signal for this year than any other year for the last 10,000 years.
Sorry but you know we have this thing the CS you know, and it has a meaning and a use for, is not a figment of imagination .it is the main climatic metric, for better or worse.
So in the climatic estimation, like when you say the warmer or colder year ever (evah), or for any time with a length beyond a 100 years, this year belongs to the 3% of the coldest years for the last 10,000 ..actually with a very very high possibility of it been the coldest ever (evah) for the last 10,000 years.
In a weather or yearly or even a decade time span estimation it could be whatever you or any one else fancies to be .and I would not really care, as I my self more interested in the climate and climate change than weather ..But when claiming an estimation in the bases of the term since the records began than you are in a climatic estimation by default, so to speak.
So no matter how many record warming years you have according to the simple weather or yearly cycles estimations, or how many such record years you may produce, it does not really mean anything in climate terms, that is why these crazy records make not even a dent to the plateau or the hiatus or put another way .these record years can not give you back that large amount of the missing heat, no matter what, because that is all to do with climate and not weather .
hope this is not very complicated in principle..
cheers.
Nonsense. Once again—nonsense.