[DoodleDawg]

Depends on your point of view. In the eyes of Creationists the tide has already turned towards intelligent design. In the eyes of science it has not and never will.

[jda]

In the eyes of science . . .

Don't you mean "In the eyes of those who hold fast to the religion of evolution"? They will never be able to see anything that contradicts their religious dogma!

[microgood]

Depends on your point of view. In the eyes of Creationists the tide has already turned towards intelligent design. In the eyes of science it has not and never will.

But science has no clue how life began on this world and never will.

[huldah1776]

When sharia law is enforced.

[kosciusko51]

Science has no eyes. Scientists do.

[txrefugee]

If God Himself wrote on the sky with stars: “God made the universe,” the closed mind of so-called “science” would find some “rational” explanation. Don’t believe your lyin’ eyes when trying to explain away the Creator.

[tophat9000]

Question.. There is popular common belief that man uses only 10 to 15 % of the brain..

But from an natural selection evolutionary viewpoint you would not evolve something that is not used.

One or the other should not be true

[Greetings_Puny_Humans]

Depends on your point of view. In the eyes of Creationists the tide has already turned towards intelligent design. In the eyes of science it has not and never will.

That's a statement of faith-- thus revealing the shallowness of the evolution defenders.

[Chuckster]

I suspect that when progressives decide that the space alien genetic engineering theory can be successfully promoted as an alternative, they will abandon Darwin.