Posted on 01/09/2015 1:05:38 PM PST by Jan_Sobieski
Slander-
Law.com. n. oral defamation, in which someone tells one or more persons an untruth about another, which untruth will harm the reputation of the person defamed. Slander is a civil wrong (tort) and can be the basis for a lawsuit.
Given the subject no SLANDER is needed to show poor character.
Slander-
Law.com. n. oral defamation, in which someone tells one or more persons an untruth about another, which untruth will harm the reputation of the person defamed. Slander is a civil wrong (tort) and can be the basis for a lawsuit.
Given the subject no SLANDER is needed to show poor character.
Calling Mohammed “a prophet” is, in itself, telling. No Christian believes this.
Obama also called the Koran “revealed” - something no Christian believes.
Take a look (these are GROSSLY offensive) at what FAMILY GUY said about Jesus over the years:
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=family+guy+jesus
Do a search for FAMILY GUY Mohammed and you see... nothing.
Have you seen any marches, burned buildings, protests, murders over FAMILY GUY?
Jesus Christ never slandered. He spoke truth, and those who bore the brunt of His truth felt slandered. By the same token, we do not need to slander the “Prophet” of Islam; we only need to speak the truth of the Gospel and point out the lies of Islam. Those who follow the “Prophet” will feel slandered, but that is their problem; it either leads them to repentance or to damnation, and to which it leads becomes each Muslim’s choice.
4. malign, vilify, revile.
I like that quote better than what our President suddenly blurted out some years ago. Once in a great while, Obama allows his true feelings to spurt forth unguarded, and finds himself once again, ‘acting stupidly”.
The “Prophet” Mohammed: piss be upon him.
In the sense of “4. malign, vilify, revile.” He exposed the false teachers, false prophets, and money changers using whips and strong words. So did the Apostle Paul, Jude, Peter, and others.
Gosh, Jan, I think most anybody would say that slander is false by definition.
Thank you ...
It’s not slander to say that Mohammed was a murderer and a pedophile.
Ok...if you don’t think that we use the term in our common vernacular as “4. malign, vilify, revile.” I apologize for the misprint.
close. very close ... but not quite.
slander involves a measure of falsity
but with the Islamic “prophet”... he was a mass-murderer, he did have sex with little girls, he was most of the things ... according to their own record
its still not quite precise, but we could say that
their prophet “slanders himself”
Ok. I missed this one. My apologies.
He was a paedophile and he was gay, you know.
Mohammed is a false prophet anyway.
So are most of his spiritual children (the Muslims). Homosexuality is rampant...
St. John of Damascus wrote of this is 749 AD and Hillaire Belloc did so 100 years ago.
Mohammed was just a grifter looking to put together a useful cult to support him in his power acquisition schemes.
Perhaps a modern way of putting it, but accurate.
“Mohammed was just a grifter looking to put together a useful cult to support him in his power acquisition schemes.”
So, in 1000 years, our descendants may be in a life and death struggle with “radical Scientologists”?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.