Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: JLS

I believe only 57% of funds of the WWP go to actual services.

Fisher House Foundation has almost 95%.

WWP may have started out with the best of intentions, but between it’s anti-2A management and the endless commercials it runs, I think it’s turned into another cash cow for the people who run it.


7 posted on 12/24/2014 12:12:06 PM PST by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Tijeras_Slim; InvisibleChurch
Close.

58%

In its 2012 IRS filing, Wounded Warrior reported that about 73 percent of its expenses went toward programs. But the charity is one of many that use a commonly accepted practice to claim a portion of fundraising expenses as charitable works.

By including educational material in solicitations, charities can classify some of the expense as good deeds. Ignoring these joint costs reduces the amount Wounded Warrior spent on programs last year to 58 percent of total expenditures. The charity has been criticized for its salaries, with 10 employees earning $150,000 or more. Chief executive Steve Nardizzi, whose total compensation was about $330,000 last year, said salaries are in line with similarly sized organizations.

They're far from the worst, as far as veterans service organizations go, but the exalted status they enjoy is undeserved, IMO.

There's also a gauche commercial exploitation that characterizes the WWP, which I wouldn't find so off-putting if the money raised were being put towards more useful purposes, which I don't think it is.

The organization also engages in branded partnerships for everything from ketchup to paper towels to playing cards—something that rubs other veterans’ groups the wrong way.

“It’s more about the Wounded Warrior Project and less about the wounded warrior,” said a second veterans’ advocate. “You have an organization that is spending God knows how many millions of dollars saying that they’re helping people, but they’re not,” said Davis, an Iraq War veteran.

It reminds me in some ways of Susan G. Komen's exploitation of breast cancer.

28 posted on 12/24/2014 12:31:07 PM PST by OddLane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Tijeras_Slim
I believe only 57% of funds of the WWP go to actual services.

Navy Relief Society scores far better and has been around for much longer doing great work

Navy Relief Score

Fisher House is by far the best one out there, percentage wise, but does not bring in the $ that WW or Navy Relief brings in.

36 posted on 12/24/2014 12:39:07 PM PST by rjsimmon (The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Tijeras_Slim

http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&orgid=12842#.VJs1fcACAc

$375,000 salary to executive director - that’s when I got turned off from sending donations.


50 posted on 12/24/2014 1:53:16 PM PST by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson