Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: maggief

Camille is surely not “living a lie.” If these things are true they are way in the past and she surely knows of them or of the proclivity.If I received a ton of accusations from 40 years ago about my wife it would probably not affect me a lot. I have lived with her a very long time and we are quite compatible. Obviously those things are not continuing if true in the first place. I would assume she has made her peace with God and repented if there is something to repent. What else does one need? Why disrupt life in the latter portion for something that is no longer relevant? As for Camille, If BC really were the Rogue that the headlines say he was I suspect she was quite aware when she married him. He would have had a well known in his circle if not public reputation.


38 posted on 12/22/2014 7:10:47 AM PST by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: arthurus
Camille is surely not “living a lie.” If these things are true they are way in the past and she surely knows of them or of the proclivity.If I received a ton of accusations from 40 years ago about my wife it would probably not affect me a lot.

Seriously, you think lying is the way to go?

One case is from 2008, when Cosby settled for another drugging/rape case in 2006, it was for a 2004 rape, a police report was filed in 2000 for a 1998 assault.

Why try to claim that these rapes are all almost as old as the Juanita Broaddrick rape?

41 posted on 12/22/2014 7:17:25 AM PST by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: arthurus

It’s beyond living a lie ... it’s opening up her trap, claiming her husband is the victim.


44 posted on 12/22/2014 7:40:32 AM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson