Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: the scotsman

We can only hope you’ve got it right.

But you know...in London alone there are 607,000 Muslims.

A 1% birth rate of that group alone would be 6000.

And that would be unique since most Muslims do quite a bit more than that pretty much everywhere else. And we havent included hotbeds like Birmingham.

Perhaps I’m missing something like a skewed distribution of Muslims.

It would seem to be quite a bit higher than you allege.

Please feel free to disabuse me of that notion with any data.

Personally I see no reason for the demography of England and Europe in general to change so radically in just a few decades, and especially not with certain groups being dominant. London is now 60% White, down from oh what, 99% in 1960? And for the previous 2000 years?

When did the British vote for that?


36 posted on 11/30/2014 8:58:44 PM PST by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: Regulator

I am giving you the facts on the UK as much as I can. All this story shows is a shocking lack of imagination, not some muslim takeover. As to London, it was not 99% in 1960.

With all respect, Americans are ignorant of the immigration to the UK since 1945: we had a huge influx of black Caribbeans from 1948 to the 60s, as well as a large influx of people from the Indian sub-continent in the 50’s and 60s. As well as HK Chinese. London hasn’t been 99% white since the late 1800’s. Its a city, by definition, it will be cosmopolitan.


38 posted on 12/01/2014 3:32:48 AM PST by the scotsman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson