Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Pajamajan

Yeah. I don’t see why the government has the authority to take other people’s animals because they *could* be dangerous. Unless a specific animal has proved itself to be harmful to other people or their property, the government should not have the ability to take away an animal. As to why some people on the site are encouraging such an overreach, I don’t know. Their hatred of the breed obviously overrides reason. It’s the same thing as with guns. People have “violent” dogs for not only companionship, but for protection. How do they decide what constitutes as a “Pitbull” or “Doberman,” anyways?. Are they adopting Nazi methods of determining “breeds”? If an animal is only half Doberman or Pitbull, does that make it equivalent to a “full” bred animal?


96 posted on 11/25/2014 4:28:47 PM PST by Politicalkiddo ("It is the first responsibility of every citizen to question authority."- Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]


To: Politicalkiddo

“Are they adopting Nazi methods of determining “breeds”? If an animal is only half Doberman or Pitbull, does that make it equivalent to a “full” bred animal?”

Yes and very few people are capable of truly assessing a dog’s actual breed[s].

Most lab mixes are mistaken for Pits, as are other broad-skulled breeds.

I have seen things claimed as “Dobermann mix” that were absolutely laughable.

They are not the only black and tan dog on earth.


101 posted on 11/25/2014 7:51:16 PM PST by Salamander (My soul's on fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

To: Politicalkiddo

http://www.pickthepit.com/


102 posted on 11/25/2014 7:52:14 PM PST by Salamander (My soul's on fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson