And I suppose you and ansel were all in with Anita Hill’s accusations of sexual harassment against Clarence Thomas.. or the accusations of rape against the Duke lacrosse team.. or the allegation of rape from Tawans Brawley.
After all... hypocrisy and such.
And my point is (which I am sure you got) that I am certain you have accepted unfounded allegations before as truth...without evidence. You know you have...and its probably because you don't like the people in question...so you are more willing to "convict" in the court of public opinion with little evidence. Weapons from Libya to Syria? House says NOPE. Conspiracy? HOUSE says NOPE. Military could have responded but was told to stand down? HOUSE SAYS NOPE.
And so to my point again....you probably believe all the above allegations even though evidence says otherwise (and there are certainly a lot less witnesses)...so don't get on here spouting about evidence and rules in a court of law...when you've done the same thing.
And that's all I'm saying. MANY MANY MANY women were willing YEARS ago to get put under oath...and he settled out of court so they wouldn't. Another witness has come forward and said he paid the women and basically flew CAP and CAS for Cosby.
Bottom line is this: There is a lot more evidence that Cosby is a rapist than Bill Clinton. There is a lot more evidence that Cosby is a rapist than there is Hillary is responsible for Benghazi....and the legal process has actually cleared her (not that I buy it...I think the House Benghazi report released on Friday is a bunch of crap....).