Skip to comments.
'Science shattered': Hand of God suddenly revealed?
http://www.wnd.com/2014/11/science-shattered-hand-of-god-suddenly-revealed/ ^
| 11-16-2014
| Drew Zahn
Posted on 11/18/2014 5:34:10 AM PST by UMCRevMom@aol.com
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
To: UMCRevMom@aol.com
Sort of like “wheels within wheels.” The simplest explanation that explains the observations is probably the correct one.
2
posted on
11/18/2014 5:44:22 AM PST
by
arthurus
To: UMCRevMom@aol.com
[T]he documentary makes the case that the data science is discovering indicate the entire known universe is pointing directly at Earth.Ohhhh-kayyyy
3
posted on
11/18/2014 5:54:50 AM PST
by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
To: UMCRevMom@aol.com
Lutheran astronomer Ole Christensen Roemer determined in 1676 that the speed of light was finite, not instantaneous, based on the delay in seeing a moon of Jupiter from Earth after the earth had moved in its orbit to the other side of the sun.
In 1838, another Lutheran astronomer and mathematician, Friedrich Bessel, was the first to measure the distance to a star using the parallax method, which depends on the earth moving in an orbit around the sun (rather than the sun moving around a fixed earth).
To: UMCRevMom@aol.com
I took a physics class as an undergrad, one of the tests a question was simply: “Calculate the weight of the moon”
5
posted on
11/18/2014 6:03:13 AM PST
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: UMCRevMom@aol.com
OK.
Land a probe on a comet.
Feel free to use any assumptions you like regarding the structure of the universe.
To: central_va
That's an easy one.
Zero.
The mass, however, is another story.
7
posted on
11/18/2014 6:15:49 AM PST
by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: UMCRevMom@aol.com
I thought time and space revolved around Obama?
8
posted on
11/18/2014 6:17:15 AM PST
by
moovova
To: ShadowAce
The mass, however, is another story.Correct I meant to say mass not weight. I got the right answer....
9
posted on
11/18/2014 6:17:56 AM PST
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: BenLurkin
Ohhhh-kayyyy
It’s not all that unlikely, actually. I”m not saying it is what I believe, but it’s not all that far fetched.
When I was in fifth grade (1965), I was riding my bike, contemplating life, the universe and everything and sudenly I stopped and asked: What if none of this is real, even the people, and only I am real? What if it is all just an insertion into my consciousness that exists on some other plane?
And decades later we have “The Matrix”. :-P
Fact is, there is so little actual matter making up the universe that it is made out of, essentially, nothing. We only perceive it to be something.
Seriously.
10
posted on
11/18/2014 6:19:03 AM PST
by
cuban leaf
(The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
To: central_va
Are you sure your physics question really wasn’t “Calculate the *mass* of the Moon?”
11
posted on
11/18/2014 6:19:08 AM PST
by
Triple
(Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)
To: Triple
Yes it was mass and it was 30 years ago.
12
posted on
11/18/2014 6:20:33 AM PST
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: cuban leaf
God’s creation is very real, and we are all in it both physically as well as spiritually.
13
posted on
11/18/2014 6:22:11 AM PST
by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
To: Triple
Is it even possible to calculate the mass of kim kardashian’s “mass”?
14
posted on
11/18/2014 6:23:25 AM PST
by
newfreep
("Evil succeeds when good men do nothting" - Edmund Burke)
To: UMCRevMom@aol.com
I thought it was revealed in 1986 when Maradona scored against England.
15
posted on
11/18/2014 6:24:21 AM PST
by
dfwgator
To: ShadowAce; central_va
The weight of the Moon is the gravitational force exerted on it by some other object. For the sake of simplicity in interpreting the question, I’ll ‘assume’ that the other object is Earth. That gravitational force is obviously NOT zero.
To: BenLurkin
Gods creation is very real, and we are all in it both physically as well as spiritually.
I absolutely agree. My point is that, though we see it as lots of solid stuff, in reality there is almost nothing there. My personal belief is that God is efficient. He created it out of “nothing”, it really is “nothing”, and can be smooshed up to create a whole new “nothing”.
But he gave us biological machines (called the natural man) to occupy while we are here. It is designed to perceive this world very much as “something”.
IOW, I’m not denying God. Rather, I’m applauding His creativity!
17
posted on
11/18/2014 6:31:10 AM PST
by
cuban leaf
(The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
To: NorthMountain
18
posted on
11/18/2014 6:32:35 AM PST
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: NorthMountain
Never assume. That wasn’t part of the question. My reference point could be the Horsehead Nebula.
19
posted on
11/18/2014 6:32:51 AM PST
by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: ShadowAce
You can assume the orbit of the moon is perfect and the radius of the orbit is 238,857 miles cg to cg.
20
posted on
11/18/2014 6:35:23 AM PST
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson