The last thing I want is for this regime to decide what is NEUTRAL. If TRANSPARENCY of the administration is any example, I’ll take my chances with the system as it is without government screwing with it.
Every single time the government gets involved with private business and industry, it turns it to crap and makes misery - like a king Midas in reverse.
No thanks. Keep the government OUT of even LOOKING at the internet.
Yeah....”Equal Access” means bait and switch....and YOU get to pay for the freebies of the CHOSEN ones, ie losers.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Net_neutrality
“Net neutrality (also network neutrality or Internet neutrality) is the principle that Internet service providers and governments should treat all data on the Internet equally, not discriminating or charging differentially by user, content, site, platform, application, type of attached equipment, or mode of communication.”
Essentially, “net-neutrality” is a highly anti-competitive measure preventing innovation such as offering premium Internet services, with the result that all Internet traffic is reduced to the lowest common denominator, that is, all Internet traffic remains equally as slow, which of course is the heart of all socialistic schemes.
If “net-neutrality” were to be applied to the telephone system, then unlimited calls to anywhere in the world would all cost the same as a call to your next door neighbor. Of course, the quality of all those calls would suddenly become equally as bad. Likewise, cell phones would never have been allowed to be utilized under “net-neutrality”, since these represent a premium calling mechanism for which people pay a premium price.
So-called net neutrality amounts to nothing more than applying Marxist principles to the Internet: “To each Internet user according to his need, from each Internet provider according to their ability to pay”.
It’s no wonder Obama whole-heartedly endorses “net-neutrality”(assuming he even understands what it means in the first place, and isn’t endorsing it just because it sounds “fair”.)
Libs love to pick names that are the opposite of what the proposed law is supposed to do.
My marketing professor always said "advertise your weakest point". If your restaurant's food tastes bad, then advertise "Great tasting food!". If service is slow, then advertise "Speedy service!".
I always look at a company's advertising, and using this rule I can determine their bad points by what they're trying to advertise as their strong points. 99% of the time it seems to always be true.
The White House Gets It Right On Net Neutrality. Will the FCC?
Wow, really?
They are denizens of the Progressive Left...ala ACLU.
Sure, they support civil liberties as long as you are not the enemy. And the enemy to them is anyone making a buck for providing a product or service.
Don't' buy Obama's bull$h_t! There is no problem and it doesn't need to be regulated.
Thrown out in a court challenge.
