Posted on 11/08/2014 7:57:28 AM PST by Excellence
Vary long explanation of the "polar vortex" that will, supposedly, attack this coming week. Very interesting explanation. Things are not as some forecasters might portray it. It's still going to be ugly, possibly for Thanksgiving. Joe argues for more research for short term forcasting, because the current modeling isn't terribly accurate because of changes, maybe because of solar dimming. Maybe. But this is the problem; that there isn't enough research done for short-term forecasting. Case in point: The sudden crash of the Southern Oscillation index and its effect on the feedback of heat from energy released by convection activity is not being picked up by the models. In all, though, Joe sees more cold this year than last. Sorry.
(Excerpt) Read more at weatherbell.com ...
And all of those invasive species!
The Foods We're Not About to Lose
HARRIS: Unquestioningly one-sided climate-change coverage
Global Warming on Free Republic
Hold on tight you lower 48’ers! Call an Alaskan for advice on how go thrive in the cold!
Nah, we’re west of the Rockies, we’re good. :)
As always, thank you for the ping to Bastardi’s Summary!!
I’m certainly no expert on climate, but from what I can gather, our ‘total atmospheric CO2 level’ is just 3.4% IF I’m not mistaken, correct? and man’s contribution to the total atmospheric CO2 level is a piddly 0.003%? (I’m not sure these figures are correct, but I believe they are close?)
So, if our ‘total atmospheric CO2 level’ is only 3.4%, how in the world is such an insignificant portion of the total atmosphere responsible for global climate change? The ‘man-caused warmists’ make it seem like there is a huge thick blanket of CO2 surrounding the planet, preventing heat from escaping the atmosphere, and being reflected back toward earth, causing global climate change- but rationally, with just 3.4% of our atmosphere being CO2, once must either conclude one of two things, either there are scattered small, insignificant pockets of CO2 in the atmosphere which no doubt are separated by 1000’s of miles where the atmosphere contains NO CO2- OR that there is a ‘blanket of CO2’ surrounding the earth, but that it is so thin that it couldn’t possibly be trapping ANY heat at all.
IF the UN and our government, and other world governments are going to impose trillions and trillions of dollars of fines, mandates and regulations in the name of ‘man-caused’ global warming- shouldn’t they be REQUIRED to explain to the world how just 3.4% of our ‘total atmospheric CO2 level’ I capable of causing global climate change? And shouldn’t they be required to explain why, despite rising CO2 levels by man (which is still only 0.003%) why the earth hasn’t warmed in 18 years now? Why aren’t the republicans screaming these facts from the rooftops? The fact that the ‘total atmospheric CO2 level’ is only 3.4%, and that there is no possible way such a small amount could affect global temperatures, should be enough for credible scientists to put a complete stop to this nonsense- this scam- and it should be enough for republicans to put a stop to all this nonsense once and for all- We’re about to be slammed with massive fines and regulations, and both the republicans and democrats sit idly back and are content it seems to let this lie infest the world, financially crippling everyone- We’re already suffering staggering high energy costs, and it’s going to get much much worse- and the GOP is nearly silent on the issue?
Yes I know he is championing the cause, but as you say, He gets very little coverage- I’ve emailed both him and Marc Morano who used to work for him- asking why the left is getting away with this colossal lie, why the GOP basically sits on their hands and does practically nothing to stop it- but got no reply- The whole lie could be exposed IF the GOP DEMANDS that the left explain how just 0.004% of the atmosphere (0.004% is the amount of CO2 in our atmosphere) can cause global climate change- And since they will NOT be able ot the GOP should DEMAND that no further action be taken to bilk any m ore money from we the innocents- and infact we should probably be reimbursed for what we’ve already paid into this scam since it was all based on lies and scare tactics-
and just for the record, I got my figures a bit mixerd up in my previous post- the total atmospheric CO2 level is only 0.004%- and man’s piddly contribution to that scant 0.004% is just 3.4%- the rest of the 0.004% is completely naturally caused- Yet the UN has come out and declared man is entirely 100% responsible for global warming/climate change>? Again I ask how only 0.004% of the atmosphere can affect global temperatures- The scam artists would have us believe a thick blanket of CO2 covers the entire earth when the fact is that there simply is not anywhere near enough CO2 to spread around the earth- there are only very very small isolated pockets of CO2 in the atmosphere 1000’s of miles apart from each other, and vast majority of the atmosphere is CO2 free- so there is NO WAY Co2 is causing global warming- period- it’;s simply impossible considering the insignificant amount of CO2 in our atmosphere
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.