To: mbarker12474
Marijuana has its own particular damaging effects, distinct from alcohol, and it will likely never be consumed as widely as alcohol, but like alcohol, it has NO positive effects which merit its societal and legal acceptanceWe've tried banning alcohol and marijuana, and learned that these bans also had damaging effects: enrichment of criminals, removal of the substance from effective regulation (such as age limits), and all the ills that flowed from those.
9 posted on
11/05/2014 10:05:14 AM PST by
ConservingFreedom
(A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
To: All
Now DC can dedicate all the resources they used to arrest dealers and users to other revenue generating activities and return the tax savings to the people...
10 posted on
11/05/2014 10:07:53 AM PST by
newnhdad
(Our new motto: USA, it was fun while it lasted.)
To: ConservingFreedom
We've tried banning alcohol and marijuana, and learned that these bans also had damaging effects: enrichment of criminals, removal of the substance from effective regulation (such as age limits), and all the ills that flowed from those. I may be the only advocate of Prohibition in the land, but I dare say that the deleterious consequences of Prohibition were less than the deleterious consequences of its repeal.
To: ConservingFreedom
We've tried banning alcohol and marijuana, and learned that these bans also had damaging effects: Yes they do, but they pale in comparison to the horrific disaster caused by tolerating drugs.

23 posted on
11/05/2014 11:19:49 AM PST by
DiogenesLamp
(Partus Sequitur Patrem)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson