Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Yosemitest
After reading the OPINION pieces that you agree with, I read the actual decision. A link to the decision (pdf) can be found at Supreme court rejects McDaniel's election challenge appeal (WDAM).
274 posted on 11/02/2014 1:23:21 PM PST by TwelveOfTwenty (See my home page for some of my answers to the left's talking points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies ]


To: TwelveOfTwenty
And you'll find NOTHING IN IT THAT SUPPORTS THEIR RULING.
THE ONLY ACTUAL LAW THAT IS QUOTED, SUPPORTS COLEMAN AND LAMAR (pages 22 thru 30).
I'll bet you never even looked at Memo re: Analysis of the appeal pleadings in McDaniel v. Cochran.

But the FARCE of JUSTICE is a trademark of the "ESTABLISHMENT REPUBLICANS".
279 posted on 11/02/2014 2:43:08 PM PST by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies ]

To: TwelveOfTwenty
In the DISSENTING JUDGEMENT (pages 22-30), JUSTICE COLEMAN quoted three separate deadlines (page 28) that were longer than 20 days in the Election Code, but yet they still decided AGAINST McDaniel.
The Supreme Court of Mississippi ignored the current Law, made up their own Law, and still stated that they had NO "authority to write into the statute something which the legislators did not write therein, nor to ingraft upon it any exception not included by them [Legislature].”

What a FARCE!
Justice Coleman and Justice Lamar are the only ones on that Court that I respect.

281 posted on 11/02/2014 3:07:19 PM PST by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson