Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Karl Spooner

I remember in his biography, Erich Hartman preferred the ME-109 to the better performing FW-190. After reading this, I wonder if the 190 really was the better performer.

I do know that late in the war the Germans had developed a really powerful engine for the BF-109. I think something like 2000 HP which should have been a real terror in such a small plane.


8 posted on 10/29/2014 3:13:17 PM PDT by yarddog (G)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: yarddog
I remember in his biography, Erich Hartman preferred the ME-109 to the better performing FW-190.

Gunther Rall felt the same way. Matter of trust I guess. I heard the 190 had some problems in a dive.

12 posted on 10/29/2014 3:56:03 PM PDT by Karl Spooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: yarddog
I do know that late in the war the Germans had developed a really powerful engine for the BF-109. I think something like 2000 HP which should have been a real terror in such a small plane.

That was the reaction of The Israelis to the Avia-S-199 (Czech Bf109)

Bigger engine, heavier moving machinery, more torque effect, add narrow undercarriage=beast

22 posted on 10/30/2014 6:57:53 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (without fear or favour: no dog in the fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson