As for this particular bit of opinion, attempting to explain origins is not evidence of religion, neither is worrying about possible outcomes. It's silly to try and re-cast everything as "just another version of what I believe, simply not the correct one." It's a childish game.
Sorry. It takes just as much (or more) faith to believe in no god as it does to believe in Him.
Atheism is a religion - just like Communism was.
Get back to me when you figure out what happened before time began - and what that concept even means. Or how about this, what is one centimeter beyond the end of all space? And what does that even mean?
And what is the difference between nothing, and everything.
Humans are not even smart enough to ask the most important questions, let alone give the answers, as to how all of this exists without a God outside our constraints of time and space.
To believe otherwise is a religion, whether it’s organized or not.
Atheism makes a positive statement concerning the metaphysical. That makes it a religion. Agnosticism, however, is not a religion.