Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DoodleDawg; X Fretensis

Lamon said that the arrest warrant was Lincoln’s response to Taney’s Ex parte Merryman ruling finding the suspension of habeas corpus unconstitutional.

Lamon claimed that Lincoln told him to execute the warrant at his own discretion unless otherwise directed. Lamon never gave any explanation for why he didn’t follow through with it.

Lincoln appointed Lamon United States Marshal for the District of Columbia in 1861 and he held that position until Lincoln’s death. Lamon was constantly in Lincoln’s company and he was the US Marshal, so he was in a position to have been given such an assignment if there ever was one. But we have only Lamon’s account that there was such an arrest warrant issued.


48 posted on 10/18/2014 12:33:42 PM PDT by Pelham ("This is how they do it in Mexico"- California State Motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: Pelham

But again, how is it that every single biographer of Taney did not include this claim in any of their works on the Chief Justice? If there was a shred of truth behind it one would think that they would have detailed it. But none of them have.


50 posted on 10/19/2014 5:35:05 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson