Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance
However, unlike the awful Sten, the M3 "grease gun" was a very reliable, fairly well-built and accurate weapon.
10 posted on 10/14/2014 7:50:14 AM PDT by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: RayChuang88
However, unlike the awful Sten

Ive had several. Only the MK III would get close to awful. As with any SMG, if you have crappy magazines, you'll have a crappy shooting experience. I bought Sten Mags 100 at a time....would throw 30 or so away after a day at the range.

Oh, and you need a sten gun/Lanchester magazine loader or you are going to have a very bad day loading.

21 posted on 10/14/2014 8:29:42 AM PDT by DCBryan1 (No realli, moose bytes can be quite nasti!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: RayChuang88
"M3 "grease gun" was a very reliable, fairly well-built and accurate weapon"

Reliable - yes, accurate - no. Not that the latter matters much in a full-auto only weapon. In fact, an accurate submachine gun is almost an oxymoron. The intended purpose was to spray lots of bullets towards a target and hope that at least one ends the threat.

The M3 series fires from an open bolt and incorporates a massive bolt to counter the recoil momentum. Upon squeezing the trigger, that bolt slams home and greatly disrupts the gun from wherever the sights may have been pointing. I carried one in Vietnam until I bought a much better M1A1 Thompson Submachine Gun on the gray market.

26 posted on 10/14/2014 9:58:48 AM PDT by Buffalo Head (Illigitimi non carborundum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson