Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Owen
That is certainly an argument for imposing an import tax on petroleum, and using the revenue to promote energy security by either increasing the SPR or by subsidizing shale oil production.

There is also the issue of Keystone XL to consider, tho . . . Maybe we can consider ourselves “energy independent” on a continent basis, without reference to the Canadian border.

How does shale NG play into this equation? Isn’t that cheaper energy - for stationary uses, at least - than Saudi crude?

21 posted on 10/14/2014 2:52:07 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion ("Liberalism” is a conspiracy against the public by wire-service journalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: conservatism_IS_compassion

Subsidizing shale oil production?????

How very conservative a perspective, injecting government into capitalism.


23 posted on 10/14/2014 4:27:56 PM PDT by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson