To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
Gosh, I wonder why the entertainment industry would lampoon the Immaculate Conception and abstinence?
2 posted on
10/11/2014 3:23:54 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: SunkenCiv
lampoon the Immaculate Conception
Outright mocked in Star Wars Ep 1. Mocked outright.
3 posted on
10/11/2014 3:26:07 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
To: SunkenCiv
It lets them slam the religious devotion of Hispanics as well, while remaining “playful”.
5 posted on
10/11/2014 3:29:53 PM PDT by
oblomov
To: SunkenCiv
With all due respect, please look up the Immaculate Conception; you have the wrong idea.
Nevertheless, I agree with you that Hollywood never passes on an opportunity to mock Christianity.
6 posted on
10/11/2014 3:31:30 PM PDT by
jtal
(Runnin' a World in Need with White Folks' Greed - since 1492)
To: SunkenCiv
I am with you.
Of course they couldn’t name her something like Shaneequa or Linda, it had to be Jane, an older name that is sometimes combined with Mary. And an immaculate conception??!! Could they be any more obvious.
I group this with ET, a movie about a being who dies and comes back to life with the promise of coming back, which I took as mocking Christ.
Gwyneth Paltrow is the perfect face for the Hollywood cesspool.
To: SunkenCiv
23 posted on
10/11/2014 3:48:01 PM PDT by
MeganC
(It took Democrats four hours to deport Elian Gonzalez)
To: SunkenCiv
"Gosh, I wonder why the entertainment industry would lampoon the Immaculate Conception and abstinence?"
"Those who don't know, teach."
To: SunkenCiv
It's not even Immaculate Conception. You're thinking of Virginal Conception.
"Immaculate Conception" refers to Mary's conception, i.e. Mary the embryo, not Jesus the embryo.
51 posted on
10/11/2014 4:25:03 PM PDT by
Mrs. Don-o
(Seriously.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson