And the Democrat would be better, why?
Simply because a DemocRAT would not be voting within the House’s Republican caucus. This character is FOR a “pathway to citizenship” (known correctly as amnesty for those unafraid of speaking the word) and for “getting things done” & “working across the aisle” (all code language for working with ‘Rats to give them what they want).
The 2014 election will yield an increased number of Republicans in the House. In the Republican caucus currently the number of conservative Republican is high enough to USUALLY keep Boehner from heading off to give the Chamber of Commerce an unending supply of cheap labor through AMNESTY and other progressive actions. My hope is that in addition to increasing the absolute number of conservatives in the House Republican caucus we also SUBSTANTIALLY increase the percentage of conservatives in the caucus. Electing this AMNESTY SHILL does not advance us toward that goal but works against that goal. Replacing RINOs (e.g., Cantor with Brat) in conservative districts advances our mission; replacing relative conservatives with RINOs such as Young does NOT advance the mission but, rather, hinders it.