Has anything changed other then a longer so-called test run?
Still with unstated "additives" BUT to which there are supposed changes in end result -- yet everyone must still take their word on that for it.
Measurements and end result energy use and production are subject to calculations which are derived from formula -- and there are several steps along the way to reach the end [alleged] result of "extra" energy produced.
It's all a crafty, moderately complex game of smoke & mirrors.
I know I am being a bit condescending and a little insulting. I am sorry. I am only doing it because you refuse to actually click on the link and read the report.
I was once where you are. I am very familiar and very wary of science scammers looking for dolts ready to hand over their cash. There are plenty out there.
The amount of energy sounds way to good to be true.
Coulomb barrier prevents the possibility, etc.
But I actually read the reports. I am an engineer. I know how to read and write test reports. This is a very good one.
Please read the report.