Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/01/2014 9:42:51 PM PDT by right-wing agnostic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: right-wing agnostic

I saw Banzhaf on the tube today. A real retard, IMHO.


2 posted on 10/01/2014 9:46:00 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Stop flooding our schools with unaccompanied illegal aliens. Do it for the children!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: right-wing agnostic
The owner of the Redskins really should change it to the Fightin' Whities just to REALLY get under the skin of these collectivist nutjobs.


3 posted on 10/01/2014 9:47:58 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: right-wing agnostic

But we’re in the age of Obama now, rules, laws, constitutions mean nothing.


4 posted on 10/01/2014 9:50:30 PM PDT by Cubs Fan (Where we're headed is worse than mere socialism http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Anarcho-tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: right-wing agnostic

I have wondered why, all of a sudden, it’s become a liberal cause celebre to try to force the Redskins to change their name.

How do liberals decide what their causes are?

And, is this an orchestrated campaign? We’ve seen politicians, all Democrats I believe, weigh in. We’ve seen some news organizations and commentators weigh in. Some of them have said they will not use the name “Redskins” in their sports coverage or commentary.

And now the FCC is considering banning the word “Redskins”??

Why are they doing a full court press against Redskins and not other Indian team nicknames? Or will they go after the Braves, Blackhawks, Indians, Chiefs, etc. if they can force the Redskins to change their name????


5 posted on 10/01/2014 10:01:25 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego (s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: right-wing agnostic

11 posted on 10/01/2014 10:15:16 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: right-wing agnostic

Liberals can’t win on the merits, so they have to get the FCC involved to issue blanket threats to broadcasters. “Redskins” has become the latest four-letter word to the average small minded Obama Drone.


19 posted on 10/02/2014 1:06:19 AM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (You have entered an invalid birthday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: right-wing agnostic

“Redskin” is a derogatory, offensive term. However, the FCC shouldn’t be banning broadcasters from saying the word.


23 posted on 10/02/2014 2:38:37 AM PDT by gunn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: right-wing agnostic

The FCC receives thousands of petitions from demented nutballs every year. Most are quickly dismissed on technical grounds.


28 posted on 10/02/2014 6:01:34 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: right-wing agnostic

If the FCC could ban the word “Redskins,” in 2016 they could decide that the name of the Republican nominee for President is an obscene word and forbid its being mentioned on air.


30 posted on 10/02/2014 11:31:56 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson