In other words — the “climate March” consisted of every Pinko on the east coast plus a few clusters of suckers.
Well, Sonia, you and the rest of the leftists have certainly done a wonderful job thus far of striking down culture with your derivative Communist folk art.
In other words, the usual suspects...
And The Media will glorify them as being oh so righteous- but ignore any TEA party gathering as evil
Did they crap on any police cars?
Living in the shadows...
In all my decades of college teaching, I only gave extra credit for social action once: 20 points (2% of final grade) for giving blood after the 9/11 attacks, because I saw that as an act of patriotism that transcended ideology. I would never give extra credit, much less assign students, to participate in, say, a March for Life or a 9/12 rally, because that would be coercing ideology upon my students. OTOH, this is one of the reasons why our leftist adversaries continue to succeed: they do not care what their tactics are, as long as the result is the aggrandizement of their long-term goal.
“Among them illegal aliens, people who want to “stop fuel” and some students earning extra credit from their public school teacher.”
Pubic education is destroying America.
‘Culture Strike’...? Only people with to much time on their hands understand this bullshit!
Especially important to the mission of 350.org was the work of Dr. James Hansen, head of the NASA Institute for Space Studies in New York City. Hansen, who is a 350.org “messenger,” has worked to promote the idea that 350 ppm is a necessary carbon-dioxide ceiling. Much of 350.org’s activity is designed to make the “350” number, and by extension its environmental significance, a universally recognizable meme.
350.org vehemently opposes the use of fossil fuels, particularly oil and coal. Likewise, the organization opposes off-shore oil drilling. In the wake of the massive 2009 Gulf Coast oil spill, 350.org launched a campaign to protest off-shore drilling and the use of fossil fuels in general.
Also in 2009, 350.org opposed the American Clean Energy and Security Act (”cap-and-trade”), which was passed in the U.S. House of Representatives but was stymied in the Senate. In conjunction with other radical environmentalist organizations, 350.org offered opposition to the market-based legislation because: “capitalism is at the heart of the climate crisis”; “carbon trading is based in the ideological belief in the omnipotence of the market”; and economic growth is undesirable because it leads to “unnecessary” energy use.
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/printgroupProfile.asp?grpid=7623