Posted on 09/22/2014 12:25:05 PM PDT by right-wing agnostic
Josh Blackman links to an interesting new speech by (retired) Justice Stevens about the Courts campaign finance jurisprudence. Among other things, Justice Stevens argues that there ought to be little protection (or no protection?) for campaign contributions made across state lines. He begins . . .:
In the first sentence of his controlling opinion [in McCutcheon v. FEC] the Chief Justice correctly states that there is no right more basic to our democracy than the right to participate in electing our political leaders. 188 L. Ed.2d 468, 482. And in his concluding paragraph he correctly describes that right as the First Amendment right of citizens to choose who shall govern them. Id., at 507 (Emphases added).
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
“...at least thats how things are SUPPOSED to work in THIS COUNTRY.”
Exactly. I wouldn’t think so but then there is this supposed or assumed “alternative universe” of thought.
That’s the crux of the matter.
Thanks for saying what I was going to say...far more succinctly.
That tells me you think there is not a right to contribute to out-of-state elections.
“I don’t think so”...taken literally, perhaps.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.