I see, the Hollywood B movies are correct, and it was the U.S. Army conducting secret tests on Africans by infecting them with Ebola, that has unleashed this outbreak, and to disagree with your claim, is to ignore the "facts" proving it.
If they were doing so, how would it be any different than the current outcome ? Maybe they were only testing 'vaccines'. Still, it is odd that a new mutation appears at the same time a new cure appears (hint: the mutation appears two years ago and the vaccine was developed after).
and to disagree with your claim, is to ignore the "facts" proving it.
Well, aren't you ignoring the facts if you disagree that USAMRIID had ANYTHING to do with the 'testing' that was being done or the doctors and staff that were from the US who were working down there ? Was it just vaccine testing or was it virus manipulation ? More likely it was the former, but did the former cause the latter ?
My main point is that we are dealing with something that is not totally understood, and is not completely under our control. When we subject it to 'vaccines' we may be causing it to be more effective. IF and when we experiment with a virus to make it a bio-weapon, we assume that we also can control it. Again, that has not been a successful assumption.