Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: beaversmom

If anyone has any real life examples of these to post, please do so.


2 posted on 08/25/2014 1:53:59 PM PDT by beaversmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: beaversmom

“If anyone has any real life examples of these to post, please do so.”

The global warming arguments cover most of these.


5 posted on 08/25/2014 1:57:16 PM PDT by MNDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: beaversmom

Post hoc: every morning my neighbor drives by my house and then the sun comes up. Therefore my neighbors driving causes the sun to rise.


6 posted on 08/25/2014 1:58:09 PM PDT by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: beaversmom

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JuJAEt8igQ


7 posted on 08/25/2014 1:59:26 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: beaversmom

AGW alarmist argumentation.

1. Ad hominem - You’re just saying that because Big Oil is paying you off. Also, you’re worse than Hitler.
2. Straw man - You don’t believe that climate changes, but there is abundant evidence of climate change over thousands of years. Ever hear of the Ice Age? Obviously, you’re stupid.
3. Hasty generalization - CO2 is a greenhouse gas with radiative forcing potential. Therefore increases in CO2 levels will cause catastrophic global warming. It’s obvious and you’re stupid.
4. Begging the question - CO2 is pollution. Therefore EPA has authority to control it. That’s why the EPA was created.
5. Post Hoc - Both CO2 levels and global temperatures rose from 1975 to 1997. Therefore CO2 was cause of significant global temperature increases. It’s settled science.
6. False dichotomy - The government must tax CO2 emissions or it’s the end of the world. Don’t you care about your children and grandchildren?
7. Ad ignorantum - Global warming alarmists are too arrogant to admit any ignorance.
8. Burden of proof reversal = Precautionary principle. Now is the time for action; the time for debate is over.
9. Non sequitur - Any of numerous claims of harm already caused by AGW (see numberwatch.com.uk for hundreds of examples.)
10 Bandwagon fallacy - 97% !!!!!


31 posted on 08/25/2014 5:25:39 PM PDT by Skepolitic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson