Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/25/2014 12:43:28 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

Either the thing blew up and the test was a failure or the system that’s been designed to intercept hypersonic craft had a successful test.


2 posted on 08/25/2014 12:46:35 PM PDT by MeganC (It took Democrats four hours to deport Elian Gonzalez)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Interesting 'coincidence' that the Chinese reported a failure on THEIR second test of a hypersonic missile just several days ago. Going hypersonic is generically Mach 5+ or 3,840+mph / 6,150+kph and at that speed, in atmosphere, every shockwave is like a knife cut. one small oops and goombye, she be down and dead!
4 posted on 08/25/2014 12:55:37 PM PDT by SES1066 (Quality, Speed or Economical - Any 2 of 3 except in government - 1 at best but never #3!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

This is what is called “overkill”, a misunderstood term. It does not mean hitting the same target multiple times.

The reality is that missiles have a tendency to fail, and fail a lot. So if you have a hundred targets, you need extra missiles to hit them, taking the place of the missiles that failed. This is overkill.

Missiles can explode or just fail in the silo, they can fail to get out of the silo, they can fail just after leaving the silo. If they are ballistic missiles, they can fail with their first section, or when it separates from the second section, or their second section can fail. And if the missile has three sections, there are just two more ways for it to fail.

Next it can fail to achieve its proper trajectory, or its navigation and guidance might fail, it may fail in reentry, or if it is too far off target to correct itself. Its weapon may not arm, or incorrectly arm and not detonate, or just the high explosive part, not the nuclear part, will detonate.

And that is just ordinary ICBMs. MIRV (multiple warhead) missiles have even more ways to fail, and hypersonic missiles are right now about as likely to fail as succeed.

That is why they call it “rocket science”.


6 posted on 08/25/2014 1:33:05 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
The distance is around 3,900 miles and an earlier test of the missile in 2011 reached the site in around 30 minutes. The first missile test achieved speeds of around Mach 5 or about 3,600 mph.

Howzat again??

7 posted on 08/25/2014 1:33:41 PM PDT by misanthrope (Liberalism; it is not unthinking ignorance, it is malignant evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
It was then set to glide to the Reagan Test Site on the South Pacific Kwajalein Atoll at speeds of nearly 4,000 miles an hour.

4000mph is a glide? I'd hate to seer something really in a hurry...

Regards,
GtG

9 posted on 08/25/2014 1:51:59 PM PDT by Gandalf_The_Gray (I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson